Negotiations Watch: LAST, BEST & FINAL OFFER!

As predicted, the AMPTP has made its “last, best and final offer” to SAG on TV-Theatrical.  SAG has issued a statement in response.

SAG Statement

The Screen Actors Guild national negotiating committee has bargained with the AMPTP for the last 42 days and remains committed to negotiating a fair deal for actors as soon as possible.

The AMPTP today delivered a last-minute, 43-page offer that upon initial examination appears to be generally consistent with the AFTRA deal, particularly in its provisions relating to new media. The union is reviewing the complex package and will prepare a response to management once that analysis is complete.

The parties are scheduled to meet Wednesday, July 2, at 2:00 p.m.

“This offer does not appear to address some key issues important to actors. For example, the impact of foregoing residuals for all made-for-new-media productions is incalculable and would mean the beginning of the end of residuals,” said Screen Actors Guild National Executive Director and Chief Negotiator.

The Screen Actors Guild Codified Basic and Television Agreements covering television programs and motion pictures expire tonight at midnight. Work will continue and all SAG members should report to work and to audition for new work past the expiration date until further notice from the Guild.

Well known entertainment attorney Jonathan Handel says the producers will meet with SAG Wednesday to explain their position, but will not entertain counteroffers.

Our analysis: As we understand the term “last, best and final offer” this is a first step in a legal process that allows the AMPTP to impose the terms of the offer even if it’s not accepted. The only alternative to that sort of move is to strike, something that now seems impossible, because the Allens aren’t now believed to be able to get the 75% vote of the membership to authorize a strike. However, imposing the terms could change attitudes.

AMPTP Statement Below.

June 30, 2008

Statement of the AMPTP

Our industry is now in a de facto strike, with film production virtually shut down and television production now seriously threatened.  In an effort to put everyone back to work, the AMPTP today presented SAG our final offer - a comprehensive proposal worth more than $250 million in additional compensation to SAG members, with significant economic gains and groundbreaking new media rights for all performers.

Our $250 million offer is consistent with the four other labor agreements already reached this year with DGA, WGA, AFTRA Network Code and AFTRA Prime-Time Exhibit A.  In addition, our offer addresses issues that SAG identified as being of utmost concern to its members, including tailoring our new media framework for SAG in areas such as feature films and significant gains for working actors.

In short, our final offer to SAG represents a final hope for avoiding further work stoppages and getting everyone back to work. That is our goal, and we hope it is shared by the members of SAG.  The economic consequences of a work stoppage would be enormous.  If our industry shuts down because of the unwillingness of SAG’s Hollywood leadership to make a deal, SAG members will lose $2.5 million each and every day in wages.  The other guilds and unions would lose $13.5 million each day in wages, and the California economy will be harmed at the rate of $23 million each and every day. 

As SAG’s leadership considers our final offer, we will continue for now to work under the terms of the old contract as current productions wind down.

Background Materials

Negotiations History and the De Facto Strike

SAG’s Hollywood leadership has, by its own design, created the difficult predicament that SAG’s working actors now find themselves in.  Immediately after the WGA settlement, on February 14, 2008, we invited SAG to engage in early negotiations but the Guild’s Hollywood leadership insisted that only last-minute bargaining can bring notable gains.  Calls for early talks were further ignored as SAG engaged in a W&W process that got underway months later than usual because of the Hollywood leadership’s longstanding campaign against AFTRA.

Since talks finally began on April 15th, we have spent 42 days attempting to convince SAG’s Hollywood leaders that we should build upon the New Media Framework already established in four different labor agreements this year, with DGA, WGA, AFTRA Network Code, and AFTRA Prime-Time Exhibit A. 

In early June SAG’s Hollywood leadership announced an anti-AFTRA campaign, and since that time SAG’s Hollywood negotiators have squandered almost a month of negotiating time trying to defeat AFTRA’s tentative agreement instead of making its own deal. 

The result of SAG’s stalling is a de facto strike that is inexorably bringing our entire industry to a full stop.  Our final offer is designed to bring an end to this de facto strike and put our industry back to work.

The Economic Impact of an Industry Work Stoppage

If SAG rejects our offer and continues with its misbegotten anti-AFTRA campaign, SAG’s Hollywood leaders will unnecessarily harm not only SAG members and sister Guild members, but also the tens of thousands of below-the-line workers whose families depend on our industry and the millions throughout California whose businesses benefit from our industry’s growth.  With each passing day after June 30th, there will be less work for those whose livelihoods depend on our industry. 

SAG participated in the WGA strike and saw first-hand the economic damage it inflicted on the industry and the thousands of workers and businesses that had no stake in the fight.  If our industry shuts down because of the unwillingness of SAG’s Hollywood leadership to make a deal, SAG members will lose $2.5 million each and every day in wages.  The other guilds and unions would lose $13.5 million each day in wages, and the California economy will be harmed at the rate of $23 million each and every day.  A halt in production will also bring economic harm to a number of communities around the country where film and television production bring millions of dollars into local economies.

Roadblocks

The producers were put in a challenging position by having to bargain separately with AFTRA and SAG for the first time since 1980.  After 17 days of tough negotiations, we reached a tentative agreement with AFTRA but have yet to do the same with SAG after more than twice as much time at the negotiating table. 

With four major agreements concluded with the Guilds this year alone, the Producers entered the SAG talks with eight narrowly tailored proposals meant to get an agreement that much quicker. Unfortunately, SAG came in with 36 proposals – including several true deal-breakers – and thus put itself in the position of having to work harder to find common ground.  While we have made some progress, SAG continues to hold to several of these unacceptable proposals including increases in DVD residuals, restrictions on product integration and excessive increases in money and schedule breaks, stand-in minimums and mileage increases.

In addition, SAG is seeking to undermine the New Media Framework that we have constructed with three other Guilds.  This includes a demand that SAG have exclusive jurisdiction in content made for the Internet, which would prevent AFTRA from having the shared jurisdiction that it bargained for only a month ago.

Making the Framework Work

So far this year, the Producers have reached four major Guild agreements – DGA, WGA and two with AFTRA – that build on a fundamental set of new media terms. These terms are groundbreaking for a number of reasons.  First, at no point has the industry ever established so many residual formulae and jurisdictional agreements in one negotiation cycle.  Through a series of major concessions, the Producers have established standards for permanent downloads, Internet streaming, made-for new media productions and the use of clips in new media.

The New Media framework offers terms that are rich by traditional standards but also gives the Producers some flexibility to adapt and experiment.  Most of the residuals are based on a percentage of revenue that matches the best existing residuals in the SAG contract.  Further, the New Media framework allows full access to the Companies’ un-redacted new media deal memos and includes a Sunset Clause so that the parties can revisit the terms in three years with a better understanding of how the market is developing.  The New Media Framework has been adapted to the unique needs of SAG by preserving performers’ right of consent over non-promotional uses of their clips in new media, and securing a definition for “covered actors” in low-budget original made-for new media.  In short, the Producers have now proven they can make the framework work for all Guild members, and there is no reason we should not be able to do the same with SAG.

The AMPTP’s Final Offer

Our final offer is worth more than $250 million to SAG members over the course of the three-year deal, over and above what SAG members would have made under their old contract.  Our final offer includes significant gains in minimums, pension and health contributions and terms for working actors.  In addition, we have offered groundbreaking new media terms – with fair and appropriate modifications for actors — that have already served as the cornerstone of four other major Guild agreements this year, including one that ended the 100-day WGA strike. 

We hope that SAG’s Hollywood leadership will not make the tragic mistake of misleading their members by suggesting that additional stalling will lead to a better offer at a later time.  We have compromised again and again this year to reach four major labor agreements — agreements that satisfied the DGA, WGA and AFTRA — and we have now reached the end of this process.

AMPTP Final Offer Fact Sheet

The Producers’ final offer includes groundbreaking terms and residuals for actors in all forms of new media, as well as significant increases in minimums, pension and health contributions and terms affecting working actors.

MINIMUMS:

Increase minimums by 10% over the course of the contract – 3.5%, 3%, and 3.5%.

Increase network primetime rerun ceiling by 2.5% in the first and third years of the contract.

PENSION & HEALTH:

Increase contributions by 0.5% in second year of contract, bringing SAG’s pension and health rate to 15% - the highest Guild rate in the industry.

GUEST STARS:

Increase the premium payment over the day player rate from 7.5% to 10%.

BACKGROUND PERFORMERS:

Increase the number of covered background actors in television from 19 to 20 and on features from 50 to 52.

MONEY BREAKS:

Increase the trailer money break from $2,500/week to $3,000/week.
Increase three-day performer overtime money break from $2,700 to $3,000.

SCHEDULE BREAK:

Increase weekly salary figure for Schedule B performers from $4,400 or less per week to $4,650 or less per week for TV and from $5,500 or less per week to $6,000 or less per week in feature film.

NEW MEDIA:

Establish residuals for streaming television programs and features.

Establish jurisdiction and residuals for derivative and original made-for New Media programs.

Doubling of residual rate for permanent downloads.

Preserve performers’ consent over non-promotional uses of clips in New Media.

Broad definition of “covered performers” in low-budget New Media productions.

Full access to Companies’ un-redacted New Media deal memos.

Sunset Clause to protect both sides in future negotiations.

11 Responses to “Negotiations Watch: LAST, BEST & FINAL OFFER!”

  1. Trudi Goodman says:

    I know I am posting quite a bit, but I have to bring my frustrations somewhere. Sigh!
    I am sitting here and wondering what Mr. Cantor who started the SAG would think of this stuff.
    Here is a quote from him:
    “I’ve apparently come here, (he said,) ” Under a misconception. If this organization isn’t one that’s going to help every man, woman and child in the Industry, I’ll say goodnight.”

    I want to work, not not work!
    I made under 1,000 dollars last year, which is evidently the SAG actor norm. Geezh.
    A strike would be such a useless thing.
    I want to know at this point; according to SAG by laws is there a posibility of a referendum from the membership to re-call Rosenberg and Allens2.

  2. Wendell says:

    I’m holding my breath in anticipation of what the Allens will unleash now!

    But I’m afraid that distant sound is the baying of the Hunds of Hell!

    Wendell Craig

  3. Persnlmgr says:

    Congrats to Bill Thomas and the folks at AFTRA….sure looks like their deal, right down to the Sunset Clause.

  4. Voiceguy says:

    This is obviously very big news.

    It’s hard to shed any crocodile tears for the producers and all their agony in having to deal with two unions instead of one. And nothing in what the producers said refutes the contention that Nick Counter and company played rope-a-dope with SAG up to the deadline.

    What it simply means is that if the AFTRA contract is approved next week. SAG will essentially have to settle for the same terms. Approval of the AFTRA deal would be enough to indicate that a strike authorization vote would lose.

    One other significance of a Best and Final Offer, as I understand it, is that the employer can now declare a lockout if the offer is not accepted. I consider this unlikely, because behind the scenes the producers want to get this deal done, and a lockout would guarantee a very long work stoppage.

    So — we all wait until next week.

    When the history of this round of negotiations is written (by anyone other than Nikki Finke), it will have to be acknowledged that the seeds of the current situation were planted more than a year ago, when SAG began its systematic effort to marginalize AFTRA. However, the negotiating die was truly cast during the WGA strike. 100 days out, and the threat of canceling the Oscars, wasn’t enough to get a lot of fundamental objectives, such as DVD improvement. SAG was pretty much doomed once the directors and writers inked their deals.

    VG

  5. socal labor lawyer says:

    Jurisdiction (over new media) is a non-mandatory subject of bargaining. That’s basic labor law. If they’re hoping to strike with a permissive subject of bargaining on the table, they’re seriously screwed, and getting really, really bad legal advice.


    Ed. Response - In our view, SAG getting really, really bad legal advice is about the norm.

  6. Tess Harper says:

    I don’t quite get SAG’s claim regarding “forgoing residuals on new media”….. RESIDUALS IN NEW MEDIA is in there!!!!
    I wish we could “recall” the current leadership… but elections are coming up and hopefully there are going to be some new faces on the SAG BOARD, ones that are not connected in any way to MEMBERSHIP FIRST.
    And now…. the COMMERCIALS Contract.

  7. Brooke says:

    Yes the elections are coming up, so a recall election would be fiscally irresponsible since the problem will hopefully take care of itself in the next election. But, anyone know where we can get ahold of some good old fashioned tar and feathers to show the Membership Firsters just how much we appreciate them wasting our dues money and frazzling our nerves with their antics.

  8. Connie says:

    I have a question about the numbers of lost revenue from the AMPTP. Are there verifiable from OUR side?

    Ed. Response - Not really. It seems like fuzzy math to us, but it’s the number that most people seem to be using.

  9. Brian McCabe says:

    What I want to know is whether SAG negotiators were able to protect the Force Majeure clause. I see no mention in it in either statement.

  10. JCisneros says:

    Force Majeure was left intact by the AFTRA negotiations. It was felt since SAG had ongoing litigation on FM claims, it would be best to leave it intact, and not interfere in the affairs of a sister union. A wise choice to my way of thinking.

    What SAG has done with that opportunity is unclear to me.

    As to the projected losses? In 100 days of the WGA strike Los Angeles lost 2.3 billion dollars to it’s economy, that figure is confirmed by the Office of the Mayor. I don’t know where the AMPTP figures come from, but I agree with the editor that the math is fuzzy. I imagine it won’t be healthy for the industry and those who make a living from it though.

    ~J

    Ed. Note: As we understand it, AFTRA has a MFN clause in its Exhibit A contract on force majeur. AFTRA says it deferred the issue to SAG’s negotiators because AFTRA only had a very small nmber of force majeur claims pending, all of which were in arbitration, compared to SAG, which had a large number. So, if SAG gets any improvement in the force majeur language, it gets placed into the AFTRA Exhibit A agreement too.

  11. Brian McCabe says:

    I’m not concerned about improvement. I’m concerned about a reduction in Force Majeure terms. The AMPTP wanted to eliminate work stoppages from the Force Majeure clause.

    Did the AMPTP make the changes they wanted in best and final deal?

Leave a Reply